Reserve Minerals with Restrictive Covenant, not “Subject To” Debate

more+
less-

On May 17, 2012, the Texas Appellate Court - Fort Worth Division decided the case of FARM & RANCH INVESTORS, LTD. v. TITAN OPERATING, L.L.C., et al,, in which the Court affirmed the trial court’s decision that prior restrictive covenants do not reserve mineral interests, despite the intention of the parties to the deed. In deciding the case, the Court focused on the following:


LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Energy & Utilities Law Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Brandon Barchus, Faulk Barchus PLLC | Attorney Advertising

×

Expand Your Reach

JD Supra gets your content noticed, increases your visibility and makes your marketing efforts hassle free...

Learn More  or  Schedule a demo