Requests for Admission


Requests for admissions are the discovery device that is often overlooked. Perhaps that is because requests for admission are really not a discovery device. Although CR 36, the court rule governing requests for admission, is grouped with discovery rules, a request for admission does not seek the discovery of information, but instead seeks concessions that can be used as evidence at trial. Well-drafted requests for admissions can be used to narrow the issues for discovery and trial, and can be a useful tool to reduce the cost of litigation.

CR 36 allows requests for admission “that relate to statements or opinions of fact or of the application of law to fact.” The rule does not permit requests for concessions as to pure questions of law. Courts have struggled to define when a request is objectionable because it seeks a pure legal conclusion and when a request is permissible because it calls for the application of law to fact.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Lane Powell PC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Lane Powell PC on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.