Phish, Inc. v. Knighthood Tees

Reply In Support of Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction


Defendant Knighthood Tees Reply Memorandum In Support of its Motion to Dismiss argues that (a) defendants did not purposefully interject themselves into the stream of commerce in California, (b) that it would be unduly burdensome to try the case in San Francisco when plaintiffs, defendants and virtually all the witnesses -- more than 20 of them -- resided in Vermont or on the East Coast.

Judge Hamilton granted the motion on the grounds of forum non conveniens, and trasferred the case to the District of Vermont, where Judge Murtha denied then Phish's motion for preliminary injunction in all significant respects.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Motion Addressed to Pleadings | Federal, 9th Circuit, California | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Robert Scott Lawrence, Callahan & Blaine | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Callahan & Blaine on:

Popular Topics
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.