In ERISA Stock Drop Case, Supreme Court Giveth and Taketh Away on Moench Presumption

by Ballard Spahr LLP
Contact

The U.S. Supreme Court recently eviscerated a key protection against stock drop lawsuits filed by participants in defined contribution plans that hold employer stock as an investment. In Fifth Third Bancorp et al. v. Dudenhoeffer, the Court unanimously held that fiduciaries of employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) are not entitled to any presumption of prudence when facing lawsuits alleging a breach of fiduciary duty.

This is not a total victory for plaintiffs, however. Though the Court eliminated the so-called Moench presumption that had been widely adopted by the circuit courts, it also provided a new framework for pleading stock drop claims that sets a high bar for what is required to establish a breach of fiduciary duty under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA).

The Supreme Court’s decision concerned the defined contribution retirement savings plan of Fifth Third Bancorp, a large, publicly traded financial services firm. Fifth Third employees were able to defer compensation to the plan, and those compensation deferrals were invested in, among other investment funds, an ESOP that primarily held shares of Fifth Third’s common stock. After Fifth Third’s share price fell by 74 percent over a two-year period, plan participants who had lost money as a result of the decline filed a putative class action contending that the fiduciaries of the plan breached their fiduciary duty by continuing to invest ESOP funds in Fifth Third stock.

According to the plaintiffs, the fiduciaries should have known that Fifth Third’s stock was overvalued and excessively risky due to public information concerning the company’s subprime lending exposure as well as nonpublic information the fiduciaries possessed as company officers. A prudent fiduciary in that situation, according to the plaintiffs, would have sold the ESOP’s holdings of Fifth Third stock, refrained from purchasing more of that stock, or disclosed the nonpublic information to prevent the stock from being overvalued.

ERISA imposes a duty on plan fiduciaries to invest plan assets “prudently.” Ordinarily, a prudent investor must research available investment options and make an informed investment decision based on that research. However, the Moench presumption, first articulated by the Third Circuit in 1995 in Moench v. Robertson, presumed compliance with ERISA’s prudence standard when ESOP fiduciaries invested plan assets in employer stock.

In some circuits, to rebut the presumption of prudent investment, a plaintiff would need to go so far as to make allegations implicating the company’s viability as an ongoing concern or suggesting serious mismanagement of the company. As a result, the Moench presumption made it more difficult for a plaintiff to prevail against a plan fiduciary based upon claims that the fiduciary acted imprudently in continuing to offer employer stock as an investment option.

Nevertheless, in Fifth Third, the Supreme Court, in a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Stephen G. Breyer, overturned the Moench presumption of prudence. The Court held that ESOP fiduciaries are subject to the same duty of prudence that applies to ERISA fiduciaries in general, except that they need not diversify the fund’s assets. Central to the Court’s holding was the fact that the “proposed presumption makes it impossible for a plaintiff to state a duty of prudence claim, no matter how meritorious, unless the employer is in very bad economic circumstances.”

Though it declined to sustain the presumption of prudence, the Court nevertheless was sympathetic to Fifth Third’s argument that companies are often subject to “meritless, economically burdensome lawsuits” resulting from the mere decrease in price of company stock. According to the Court, however, this presumption was not the appropriate mechanism for weeding out meritless claims. Rather, the Court believed that such concerns are more properly dealt with through a “careful, context-sensitive scrutiny of a complaint’s allegations.”

Justice Breyer set forth several considerations to assist lower courts in determining whether a plaintiff asserting ERISA breach of fiduciary duty claims has adequately pleaded a cause of action under the pleading standard established by Ashcroft v. Iqbal and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly:

  • First, the Court cited its recent opinion in Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc., noting that a security’s market price is often an “unbiased assessment of the security’s value in light of all public information.” Consequently, in the Court’s view, where “a stock is publicly traded, allegations that a fiduciary should have recognized on the basis of publicly available information that the market was overvaluing or undervaluing the stock are generally implausible and thus insufficient to state a claim.”
  • Second, the Court emphasized that ERISA’s duty of prudence cannot require a fiduciary to violate the law by performing an action that would run afoul of the federal securities laws. As a result, a plaintiff cannot state a claim for breach of the duty of prudence on the basis that the fiduciary should have utilized inside information to prevent losses to the fund by divesting company stock.
  • Finally, the Court cautioned lower courts that a prudent fiduciary could reasonably conclude that a halt in purchases of company stock by the fund—which the market might interpret as a sign that company insiders viewed the company stock as a bad investment—or a public disclosure of negative information would do more harm than good to the fund. Accordingly, to survive a motion to dismiss, a plaintiff must plausibly allege that the plan fiduciary could not reasonably have reached such a conclusion.

The Fifth Third decision is not likely to dramatically alter the landscape of ESOP stock drop suits, particularly for companies with publicly traded stock. Companies may no longer defeat such actions by relying upon the presumption of prudence, but plaintiffs nevertheless still face an uphill battle in surviving a motion to dismiss, particularly in light of the Court’s categorical rejection of allegations regarding improperly valued market price and failure to capitalize on inside information.

In the private company ESOP context, the Moench presumption similarly no longer applies, but ESOP fiduciaries might take some solace in the Court's consideration that a prudent fiduciary could conclude that certain actions might do more harm than good. In an illiquid market, for example, it would seem that an ESOP fiduciary who concludes that forcing a sale at a discount is not prudent may still have some protection under the Fifth Third decision.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ballard Spahr LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Ballard Spahr LLP
Contact
more
less

Ballard Spahr LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!