Wills v. Superior Court for the State of California, County of Orange

Appellant's Reply Brief


Appellant's reply brief arguing that termination of the employment on the basis of alleged misconduct caused by a disability is the same as termination for the disability itself where the appellant has bipolar disorder, a protected mental disability that causes behavior changes. Also discussing the effect of the scope of a DFEH charge on the later court action: does just the box that was checked on the DFEH form matter, or must the court consider the narrative facts and other information informally communicated to the DFEH for purposes of exhaustion of administrative remedies under FEHA where an actual right-to-sue was issued.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:Appellate Brief | State, 9th Circuit, California | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Joshua Furman, Joshua R. Furman Law Corp. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Joshua R. Furman Law Corp. on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.