Supreme Court Refuses to Enforce Class Action Lawsuit Bans Contained in Consumer Service Agreements


Breaking Developments In Business Law

The Washington Supreme Court recently decided two extremely important consumer rights cases -- Scott v. Cingular Wireless Corp. and Dix v. ICT Group, Inc. In these two cases, the Court considered whether prohibitions against class actions in consumer service agreements were enforceable. In one case, the Supreme Court examined a mandatory arbitration agreement that contained a provision prohibiting class action lawsuits. In the second case, the Supreme Court examined a provision that provided for dispute resolution in a state, other than Washington, which does not allow class actions for claims like the ones asserted by the consumer plaintiffs. The result was two rulings that reject class action bans in agreements with

consumers that would have, in the view of the Court, prevented consumers from pursuing their substantive rights under the Washington Consumer Protection Act.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Lane Powell PC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Lane Powell PC on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.