Tortious Interference Claim Fails Without Showing of Improper Means

Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
Contact

Plaintiff, a distributor of motors and related products to automotive original equipment manufacturers and suppliers throughout the Midwest, brought claims against defendant, a manufacturer with whom plaintiff had a non-exclusive distribution agreement. Plaintiff claimed that defendant’s direct sale to plaintiff’s customers constituted, among other things, tortious interference with plaintiff’s business relationships.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
Contact
more
less

Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide