Bankruptcy and Restructuring Litigation Update


Court Refuses to Approve Debtors’ Decision to Assume Plan Support Agreement: On December 20, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York refused to approve a debtors’ request to assume a prepetition plan support agreement (“PSA”) that provided for the issuance of 100 percent of the reorganized debtors’ equity to one of the debtors’ prepetition secured lenders. Notably, the lender had cut a side deal with the debtors’ prepetition equity holder to sell half the equity received under the PSA. Although the court noted that the entire fairness standard was likely applicable, it applied the less stringent business judgment standard in refusing to approve the PSA. It also refused to find that the debtors’ decision was disinterested. The debtors had always intended to transfer equity to its former owner whether directly, as a back-stop party, or through the side deal with a secured creditor. Similarly, the court found that the PSA was not entered into with due care because the debtors did not “shop” the deal to potential alternative counterparties. Finally, the court refused to find the debtors had acted in good faith. It noted that “virtually all of the other parties in interest in the debtors’ capital structure” complained they had been shut out of the process. It additionally ruled that the fact that the debtors’ equity holder would retain 50 percent of the reorganized equity was “at best, downplayed and, at worst, obfuscated” from such parties. Finally, the court viewed as excessive the control over cash collateral afforded to the secured creditor under the PSA, including a prohibition imposed on the debtors precluding them from seeking competitive proposals, reimbursement of the secured lender’s costs, and, in certain instances, a requirement that the debtors consent to lifting the stay. The case is In re Innkeepers USA Trust, et al., No. 10-13800 (SCC) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2010), and is important precedent examining the limitations of prepetition plan arrangements among debtors and stakeholders.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.