Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al. & Perfect 10, Inc. v. Google, Inc.

Amended Opinion

more+
less-

The operator of a website which markets and sells copyrighted images of nude models brought a copyright infringement action against Google and Amazon.com. The website owner, Perfect 10, brought a motion for preliminary injunction arguing that Google’s use of thumbnail images and its practice of inline linking to full sized images violated its copyright. The District Court issued orders granting in part and denying in part the preliminary injunction against Google. The Ninth Circuit reversed.

In a case of first impression, the Ninth Circuit held that a photographic image is a work that is “fixed” in a tangible medium of expression for purposes of the Copyright Act when it is embodied (i.e., stored) in a computer server, hard disk or other storage device. The image stored in the computer is the “copy” of the work for purposes of copyright law. Nevertheless, the practice of inline linking (the display of images stored in the computer of a third party) does not constitute “copying” for purpose of the Act because Google’s computers do not actually store the photographic images themselves. Similarly, Perfect 10’s distribution right was not violated because Google did not have a collection of stored full size images on its servers. With respect to the thumbnail images on Google’s servers, the Court held that the fair use defense applied because Google was using the images in a fundamentally different way than the use intended by Perfect 10. In so doing, Google has provided a significant benefit to the public. Accordingly, the Ninth Circuit concluded Google was likely to succeed in proving its fair use defense.

This is the amended opinion of the Ninth Circuit.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:Decision | Federal, 9th Circuit | United States


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

more+
less-

Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley on:

JD Supra Readers' Choice 2016 Awards
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×