Shipping Group Monthly Bulletin - July 2011


In This Issue:


BIMCO publishes Wreckhire 2010...3


High Court grants relief from sanctions where the deadline for service of a witness statement was a bank holiday, and the statement was served late...4


Commercial Court holds that a right of first refusal constitutes a right to receive a contractual offer on terms which the party who has granted that right is prepared to accept...5

High Court holds that a party’s duty to use “all reasonable endeavours” is not limited by that party’s commercial interests...6


Court rules on a trade supplier’s entitlement to sums claimed from an insurance company under three credit supplier guarantees...7


Court of Appeal considers the issue of which court is first seised under the Brussels Regulation, when a first action which is not related to a second action for the purposes of the Regulation is amended so as to become related...9


Court finds that a conditional fee agreement is unenforceable where itseffect has not been properly explained...11


Committee approves 2010 inspection results and adopts new performance lists...12


Court of Appeal holds that privilege in advice received at a meeting with legal advisers has been waived when a witness statement refers to the nature of that advice...13


European Court of Justice considers the meaning of “place of delivery” in the context of founding jurisdiction under the Brussels Regulation...14


Commercial Court rules on the validity of a notice of readiness tendered when the berth was both occupied and unreachable due to tidal conditions...15

Tribunal considers whether Charterers were in anticipatory breach of a charterparty by redelivering the vessel early, and if so whether Owners accepted that breach as terminating the charterparty...16

Commercial Court considers the meaning of a provision in a contract for sale of a yacht that the vessel is to be of a particular Class...16

Admiralty Court rules on the apportionment of responsibility for a collision...17

Commercial Court finds that Owners are entitled to enforce a letter of indemnity given to Charterers by the receiver of the cargo, in a situation where the cargo had been delivered to the receiver on Charterers’ instructions in the absence of presentation of original bills of lading...18

Please see full newsletter below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Reed Smith | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.