Court Rejects Broad Definition of ‘Autodialer’ Under TCPA

more+
less-
Explore:  ATDS Class Action FCC TCPA

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida recently addressed a critical threshold issue in cases brought under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act arising out of text messages or calls to cellphones: what constitutes an “automatic telephone dialing system” (commonly referred to as an “autodialer”).

In De Los Santos v. Millward Brown Inc., the court rejected the broad interpretation of the phrase “automatic telephone dialing system” favored by the plaintiff-side TCPA class action bar. Rather than finding that an autodialer is any equipment that can dial a list of numbers without human intervention, the court held that an autodialer must have the present capacity to generate random or sequential telephone numbers.

Originally published on Law360.com on August 4, 2014.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  ATDS, Class Action, FCC, TCPA

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Communications & Media Updates, Consumer Protection Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »