In re Pemstar, Inc.

Order Denying Motion to Dismiss


This case covers all purchasers of the common stock of Pemstar, Inc. (“Pemstar”) during the period from January 30, 2003 through January 12, 2005. An Amended Complaint, filed on November 28, 2005, alleges that Defendants violated federal securities laws by overstating Pemstar’s accounts receivable, understating the liabilities associated with its Mexican facilities and misrepresenting its profitability.

Schatz Nobel Izard, P.C. was appointed as Lead Counsel by the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota on October 26, 2005.

This is the Court's order denying the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Complaint.

The parties have agreed to a settlement in the amount of $2.875 Million. The settlement agreement has been preliminarily approved by the Court, and a hearing on the settlement was held on August 1, 2007.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:Decision | Federal, 8th Circuit, Minnesota | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Izard Nobel LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Izard Nobel LLP on:

JD Supra Readers' Choice 2016 Awards
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.