Software and Business Methods: Patent Eligible?


Despite the clear importance of software and business method inventions in today's economies, the European and U.S. courts and patent offices have struggled to define appropriate tests for patent eligibility. In the United States, under 35 U.S.C. § 101, inventors can obtain a patent for "any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof. . . ." This broad statutory right has enabled the United States Patent Office ("USPTO") to issue countless patents to software and business methods, and many of these inventions are claimed with "process" or "method" claims. Indeed, the statute— and the Supreme Court's longstanding case law excluding "laws of nature", "physical phenomena", and "abstract ideas" from eligibility—does not articulate clear tests for when a claimed process or method should be excluded.

In Bilski v. Kappos, the U.S. Supreme Court clarified that business methods cannot be categorically excluded from patenting. The Court rejected the lower appellate court's (the Federal Circuit's) requirement that a process be tied to a particular machine or apparatus, or transform a particular article into a different state or thing in order to be patentable. Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the majority, explained that the machine-or-transformation test is a useful, but nonexclusive, tool for determining patent-eligibility of processes. Although the Court held that Bilski's claims were unpatentable "abstract ideas," it refrained from articulating a test for patent eligibility and specifically refused to adopt any "categorical rules that might have wide ranging and unforeseen impacts." Instead, the Court encouraged the Federal Circuit to continue developing case law that will define an appropriate test, leaving the lower courts, USPTO, and practitioners without clear guidance.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Finnegan | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Finnegan on:

JD Supra Readers' Choice 2016 Awards
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.