Benjamin, Weill & Mazer v. Kors: Arbitrator Must Disclose Business Relationships Which Create an Impression of Possible Bias


This published opinion dated October 12, 2010 addressed the issue of the scope of disclosures required to be made by an arbitrator handling a binding attorney-client fee disputed under the California Arbitration Act. The parties’ fee agreement specified that any fee dispute between the parties was to be submitted to binding fee arbitration pursuant to local bar association rules. This provision was given effect after the client waived her right to non-binding fee arbitration under the Mandatory Fee Arbitration Act.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sedgwick LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Sedgwick LLP on:

JD Supra Readers' Choice 2016 Awards
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.