Steiner v. Thexton: The California Supreme Court Considers the Consideration


On March 18, 2010, the California Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeal’s judgment in Steiner v. Thexton, an opinion issued in May 2008. In Steiner, the Court of Appeal held that an agreement containing a contingency allowing the buyer the sole and absolute discretion to terminate the agreement if the buyer was unable to obtain entitlements for the development was “really an attempt to create an option agreement,” which failed for lack of consideration. In overturning the Court of Appeal’s decision, the Supreme Court agreed with the lower court that the agreement was an option – not a bilateral sales agreement - but held that sufficient consideration existed to render the option irrevocable.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.