Delaware Court Issues Ruling in Backdating Case


Chancellor Chandler of the Delaware Court of Chancery yesterday issued an opinion denying motions to stay and to dismiss a derivative action involving alleged options backdating at Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. Ryan v. Gifford, No. 221-N (Del. Ch. Feb. 6, 2007). The

decision addresses many issues likely to recur in other backdating cases, though the Court limited its holding to the “unique facts” of the case.

The case arose shortly after Merrill Lynch published an analysis pointing out the “fortuitously timed stock option grants” made to Maxim executives. Suits on behalf of Maxim were then filed in federal court, California state court, and Delaware Chancery Court. In the Delaware suit filed in 2006, plaintiff named four current and two former members of the board, as defendants, claiming that they had breached their fiduciary duties of due care and loyalty.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Morrison & Foerster LLP on:

JD Supra Readers' Choice 2016 Awards
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.