Kroll vs. Incline Village General Improvement District, et al.

Plaintiff's Request for Admissions of defendant WEINBERGER (first set)


Defendant Weinberger, a lawyer, is asked about racial restrictive covenants, apparent conflicts of interest, and his previous attempts to call the municipally-owned Beaches which until recently bore prominent signs reading "Private Beach" "public but with restricted access". He is also asked if his duties as an elected Trustee to enforce the Equal Protection of the law under the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution trumped his duties to enforce a 1968 Restrictive Covenant used to keep Plaintiff out of the Beach properties. This defendant will later say he doesn't understand what "trump" means and object to the Request as "ambiguous".

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:Federal, 9th Circuit, Nevada | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Steven Kroll, Law Office of Steven E. Kroll | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Law Office of Steven E. Kroll on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.