Textron Loses Work Product Case in 3-2 En Banc Decision


In a 3-2 en banc decision issued August 13, the First Circuit rejected Textron Inc.'s argument that its internal tax accrual workpapers were protected by the work product doctrine. The decision is unremarkable on one level, given the relative simplicity of the majority analysis, and quite remarkable in other ways, given (i) the majority's avoidance of any discussion of leading circuit court opinions and its embrace of what is known as the dual purpose doctrine and (ii) the extensive 26-page dissent which describes the majority decision as misleading and corruptive of proper appellate jurisprudence. The dissent's forceful critique considered together with a continuing circuit split on the correct interpretation of the work product rule could provide a sufficient basis for review by the Supreme Court.

Please see full update below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Morrison & Foerster LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.