Renkemeyer Compounds the Confusion in Characterizing Limited and General Partners—Part 2

more+
less-

Originally published in Journal of Taxation - June 2012.

This article focuses on the Tax Court’s curious opinion last year in Renkemeyer, Campbell & Weaver, LLP v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. In this case of first impression, the court ruled that members of a law firm operating as an LLP were not “limited partners” for purposes of avoiding self-employment tax under Section 1402(a)(13) of the Internal Revenue Code on their respective allocable shares of the partnership’s income. The author discusses how Renkemeyer sheds some light on the Tax Court’s characterization for tax purposes of members of LLPs and other unincorporated entities while simultaneously leaving many questions unanswered, raising additional questions, and creating more than a little confusion, and analyzes the characterization of members of unincorporated business entities as “limited partners” and “general partners” in light of Renkemeyer and other recent judicial developments.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

more+
less-

Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×