Massachusetts High Court Rejects Retroactive Escheat Regulations


The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) recently tackled the thorny question of retroactive application of an amended interpretive regulation in the context of Massachusetts‘s Abandoned Property Law (APL), and issued a significant victory to Biogen Idec MA, Inc.[1] The court rejected the state treasurer‘s attempt to narrow the APL‘s business-to-business exemption by excluding uncashed accounts payable checks through the 2004 amendment of regulations that had been issued contemporaneously with the 2000 APL legislation and that were in effect at the time of Biogen‘s 2002 amnesty filing.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Morrison & Foerster LLP on:

Popular Topics
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.