A Co-Insured's Arson Will Not Burn Coverage


A fire insurance policy that excludes coverage for intentional acts or criminal conduct of "any" insured does not preclude coverage for innocent insureds who suffer loss because of a co-insured's intentional or criminal acts. Century National Insurance Company v. Jesus Garcia et al, Case No. S179252 (S. Ct. February 17, 2011).

The Garcias were insureds under a homeowner's policy when their adult son intentionally set fire to their home. The home sustained substantial damage, and the Garcias filed a claim under their policy to recover for their loss. The carrier denied the claim, and sued the Garcias. In the lawsuit, the carrier sought a ruling that the policy excluded coverage for intentional acts or criminal conduct of "any insured," and that the Garcia’s adult son was an insured for purposes of applying the exclusion.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.