Partners: They're What's For Dinner


Reprinted and/or posted with the permission of Daily Journal Corp. (2009)

Cost cutting is not enough to resolve the operating model problem of BigLaw, as demonstrated by the partners at Clifford Chance voting to throw at least 10 percent of their

own on the dinner table. The situation as communicated by leadership was dire enough that more than the required two-thirds partners saw it in their urgent self interest to forcibly eject so many comrades from the firm. The precedent of a U.K. “Magic Circle” firm adopting such

extraordinary measures deserves some attention. How such a measure could be presented in a way for partners in a U.S.

BigLaw firm to be encouraged to vote for the demise of many of their friends and comrades, and with some assurance that

they themselves were not on the menu, is going to be on the agenda for many firms over the next six months.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Edwin Reeser, Edwin B. Reeser, A Professional Law Corporation | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Edwin B. Reeser, A Professional Law Corporation on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.