McGhee V. Pathmark Stores, Inc.

Atlantic County, New Jersey Trial Judge grants protective order to racial harassment plaintiffs barring defense psychiatric examinations


Please see attached unpublished Trial Court opinion by Judge Kane in Atlantic County in McGhee V. Pathmark Stores, Inc. This is a LAD racial harassment case where four African American plaintiffs claim emotional distress damages as a result of racial harassment (viewing hanging nooses at work). Plaintiffs have not treated with a psychiatrist and we have no psychiatric expert.

On October 12 , 2010, the App. Div. denied defendants' motion for leave to appeal without comment.

Judge Kane’s rationale may apply by analogy to a personal injury or civil rights case. A defendant may not by way of defense contentions place a plaintiff's psychologic condition "in issue" so as to justify a defense psychiatric examination or psychological testing.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:Decision | State, 3rd Circuit, New Jersey | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Richard E. Yaskin, Esquire | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Richard E. Yaskin, Esquire on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.