No Surprises At Hearing; Demonstratives Must Only Contain Evidence of Record

more+
less-

In TriVascular, Inc. v. Shaun Samuels, IPR2013-00493, Paper 39 (September 2, 2014) the Board sustained a number of objections to the patent owner’s demonstrative exhibits. The Board agreed that modified versions of the patent drawings, and animations of the patent drawings “improperly display material not made of record previously in this proceeding” and barred the patent owner from using, citing, or relying upon this material during the hearing, but allowing the patent owner to replace the barred material, however, with evidence that was made of record timely in the case.  The Board also barred a demonstrative that did not exactly quote from evidence of record, but allowed the patent owner to substitute a demonstrative with exact quotation.  The Board did not bar material reproduced exactly from the cited record evidence, which was not previously relied upon, saying that this went to the weight that would be given, not to whether it could be presented.

 

Topics:  Evidence, Patent Infringement, Patent Litigation, Patent Ownership, Patents

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Intellectual Property Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

CONNECT

Harness Dickey, founded in Michigan in 1921, specializes in intellectual property law. The firm’s... View Profile »


Follow Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC:

Reporters on Deadline