Privilege and Work-Product


Imagine that one attorney, let’s call her Ms. Bennett, has a client, Ms. Austen. Ms. Bennett, of course, speaks with Ms. Austen. Suppose, however, that Ms. Bennett also speaks with another attorney in her firm, Mr. Darcy, about Ms. Austen’s case. Is the attorney-client privilege limited to just the communications between Ms. Bennett and Ms. Austen or is it sufficiently broad to cover communications related to a client’s matter or interests among and between multiple counsel? Last week, the Second District Court of Appeal answered this question in Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co. v. Superior Court, holding that the attorney-client privilege is not limited to communications directly between a client and his or her attorney.

The Court of Appeal also held that the “absolute work product privilege [sic] depends not on the existence of a writing but rather on the nature of the claimed privileged matter.”

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen Matkins | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Allen Matkins on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.