Ninth Circuit Ruling In Vernor V. Autodesk: Users Do Not Own Their Copies – And Why That Matters


The Ninth Circuit, on September 10, 2010, issued a highly anticipated decision in the Vernor v. Autodesk case, No. 09-35969, holding that the acquirer of an authentic copy of Autodesk software is a mere licensee and not the owner of a copy, overturning the district court’s decision. This is important because it means that licensees are in fact subject to the restrictions in the license agreement on both the transfer and use of the software and may be liable for infringement if they breach these terms, and the “first sale doctrine” in copyright law, which allows owners to freely transfer their software copies, does not apply.1 The court eliminated a source of legal uncertainty for the software industry by confirming the enforceability of licensors’ restrictions on use and transfer by users.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.