Imageline, Inc. v. Hendricks, et al.

Order Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction


This is a case where Plaintiff alleged that Defendant infringed on Plaintiff's copyright material.

The Defendant (client) brought a Motion to Dismiss, arguing that personal jurisdiction was not appropriate in the State of California. The court agreed, and granted Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. The order discusses the often-litigated issue of personal jurisdiction in cyberspace.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:Decision | Federal, 9th Circuit, California | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Venkat Balasubramani, Focal PLLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Focal PLLC on:

Popular Topics
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.