MGM v Grokster

Brief of Amici Curiae Office of the Commissioner of Baseball et al in support of petition for a writ of certiorari

more+
less-

EFF defended StreamCast Networks, the company behind the Morpheus (P2P) file-sharing software, in a case decided by the US Supreme Court on 06/23/05. Though the Court set aside the Ninth Circuit's ruling in favor of Streamcast, it also declined giving Hollywood what it truly wanted—a veto over technological innovation. Twenty-eight of the world's largest entertainment companies brought the lawsuit against the makers of the Morpheus, Grokster, and KaZaA software products, aiming to set a precedent to use against other technology companies (P2P and otherwise). The case raises a fundamental question at the border between copyright and innovation: When should the distributor of a multi-purpose tool be held liable for the infringements that may be committed by end-users of the tool?

The Supreme Court's landmark decision in Sony v. Universal found that a distributor cannot be held liable for users' infringement so long as the tool is capable of substantial noninfringing uses. This standard has been precedent for more than 20 years. Relying on this, the Ninth Circuit ruled that the distributors of Grokster and Morpheus P2P file-sharing software cannot be held liable for users' copyright violations. The Supreme Court set aside the Ninth Circuit ruling, but it refused to overturn the Betamax doctrine or to force technology companies to redesign multipurpose technologies. But rather than clarify the rules, the Supreme Court instead punted on the hard questions by crafting a new doctrine of copyright infringement liability called "inducement." Innovators now have three uncertain copyright doctrines to worry about: inducement, contributory and vicarious.

This is the amici brief on behalf of the commissioner of baseball, et al in support of the petition for a writ of certiorari.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Intellectual Property Updates

Reference Info:Appellate Brief | Federal, U.S. Supreme Court | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Electronic Frontier Foundation | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

CONNECT

From the Internet to the iPod, technologies are transforming our society and empowering us as... View Profile »


Follow Electronic Frontier Foundation:

Reporters on Deadline