Staff Assents To Exclusion Of Shareholder Proposal Requiring California Company To Hire Investment Banker

I’ve been highlighting some Rule 14a-8 no action letters concerning California Corporate law. This March 14 post discussed an unsuccessful request to exclude a proposal relating to cumulative voting and this March 18 post covered a successful request to exclude a proposal from John Chevedden. (In this post last Tuesday, Broc Romanek wrote about KBR’s recent litigation win against Mr. Chevedden.)

More recently, National Technical Systems, Inc. requested no-action advice concerning the following shareholder proposal...

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

more+
less-

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP on:

JD Supra Readers' Choice 2016 Awards
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×