California Appellate Court Okays Trial Court's Elaboration of Reasonable Doubt Instruction


For the second time this year the Fourth District Court of Appeal (Second Division) has affirmed a conviction after the trial court elaborated on the standard reasonable doubt instruction. In the earlier case, People v. Moore, the court found no error in the judge's offering examples of what constitutes proof beyond a reasonable doubt. In the latest, People v. Muniz, the court's description of an "abiding conviction" as a verdict with which the jury feels comfortable "the day you do it, two months or a year from now" was held not to lessen the burden of proof.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Gregory Ward, McManis Faulkner | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


McManis Faulkner on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.