Buck Doe v. Elaine L. Chao, Secretary of Labor

Brief For The Respondent

more+
less-

Supreme Court Requires Actual Harm for Privacy Act Damages.

The Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 decision in Doe v. Chao that an individual must prove he has suffered actual harm before he can receive a $1,000 minimum statutory award when the government wrongfully discloses his Social Security Number. EPIC, along with a coalition of civil liberties organizations and technical and legal experts, filed a friend of the court brief in the case, arguing that the Privacy Act provides damages for those who suffer "adverse effects," though no actual harm. (Feb. 24, 2004)

This is the Respondent's Brief on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:Appellate Brief | Federal, U.S. Supreme Court | United States


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Electronic Privacy Information Center | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

more+
less-

Electronic Privacy Information Center on:

JD Supra Readers' Choice 2016 Awards
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×