11th Circuit Rules PPACA Mandate is Unconstitutional – Supreme Court Review Likely


On August 12, 2011, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ruled that the individual mandate under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) was unconstitutional because it exceeded enumerated congressional authority under the commerce clause of the Constitution, but that the mandate was severable, with the result that the remainder of PPACA is constitutional. The court’s decision in Florida v. HHS, creates a split between the U.S. Courts of Appeals given the decision by the Sixth Circuit in Thomas More Law Center v. Obama, on June 29, 2011, that the individual mandate is constitutional under the commerce clause.

The plaintiffs in Florida v. HHS, which included 26 states, two individuals and the National Federation of Independent Business, had alleged that the individual mandate of PPACA and the provisions expanding Medicaid were unconstitutional and that the mandate was so integral to PPACA that the entire law was unconstitutional. The district court had granted summary judgment to the plaintiffs on all three issues, but a three-judge panel of the Eleventh Circuit, in a lengthy 2 to 1 decision, agreed only that the individual mandate is unconstitutional, finding that it was an unprecedented expansion of Congressional power, infringed on a traditional area of state regulation and was over inclusive because it requires even healthy people who are not using health care to maintain private insurance and to maintain it for their entire lives. The Court of Appeals also agreed with the lower court, and every other court that has considered the issue, that the provision of the Internal Revenue Code imposing a sanction on individuals who do not comply with the mandate is properly characterized as a penalty, and, thus, is not a valid tax.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP on:

Popular Topics
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.