Hardesty v. Astrue

Defandant's Motion and Memo to Remand


After the filing of the Appellant's brief, the AG in Chicago called and asked us if remand was OK, apparently because they saw glaring errors in this case at the District Court level. The AG here was none to happy about it, as is demonstrated in the subsequent respone to our motion for EAJA fees, but he did it. This is what the AG filed, asking the court to accept remand from the 7th Circuit.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:Federal, 7th Circuit, Indiana | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Research Specialists, Inc. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Research Specialists, Inc. on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.