Stegeman v Lillig

Appellant's Brief


After three and a half years to file an Appeal, a disabled, pro se litigant, filed the instant Brief.

Since the matter had to do with fraud upon the court by officers of the court to obtain rulings in their favors, we really believed that stair decisis and past case precedent mattered. We learned how wrong we were.

From outright being denied rulings to prevent Appellant's rights to appeal final rulings. If they refuse to give you a final ruling, you are effectively denied finality and the right to Appeal to a higher court.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:Appellate Brief | Georgia

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Janet McDonald | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Janet McDonald on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.