Rule 260.204.9 – What is to be Done (Part II)?

Allen Matkins
Contact

Last August, I wrote about the impact of the Dodd-Frank Act on Rule 260.204.9 in this post. Last Thursday, I attended a meeting called by the Department of Corporations to solicit input from persons with an interest in the rule. Technically, the meeting was held in accordance with Government Code § 11346.45. That statute requires state agencies to “involve parties who would be subject to the proposed regulations in public discussions regarding those proposed regulations, when the proposed regulations involve complex proposals or a large number of proposals that cannot easily be reviewed during the comment period”.

Commissioner DuFauchard and Corporations Counsel Ivan Griswold attended the meeting as did a number of lawyers from the private sector and a representative of the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA). The Department recognizes that Rule 260.204.9 must be amended, if for no other reason than it refers to, and is premised upon, Section 203(b)(3) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 which has been repealed effective next July.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen Matkins | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Allen Matkins
Contact
more
less

Allen Matkins on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide