Energy Brands, Inc. v. Utica Mut. Ins. Co.

Reply Brief for Plaintiff-Appellant


A strange procedural posture but an important issue avoided by the Appellate Division, Second Department of the New York Supreme Court. It found the court below's order as to the grounds for denying a motion to vacate a default judgment erroneous, but refused to address the serious substantive issue of first impression regarding malpractice of an attorney for failure to advise a client to seek insurance coverage for a trademark infringement claim, describing our client's contentions as merely "without merit."

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:Appellate Brief | State, 2nd Circuit, New York | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ronald Coleman, Archer & Greiner, PC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Archer & Greiner, PC on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.