Court of Appeal Upholds Contractual Limitations Period In Acquisition Agreement


Yesterday, the Fourth District Court of Appeal issued an opinion addressing two issues that should be of interest to the M&A community. Zalkind v. Ceradyne, Inc. involved a dispute concerning an asset purchase agreement. The Zalkinds (Stanley, Elizabeth and Quest Technology, LP, a limited partnership owned by them) agreed to sell all of Quest’s assets to Ceradyne, Inc. for cash and unregistered shares of Ceradyne’s stock. Although the Securities and Exchange Commission eventually declared the registration statement effective and the Zalkinds had sold their shares, they sued Ceradyne alleging breach of the registration requirements of the asset purchase agreement. The Zalkinds alleged that the delay in effectiveness prevented them from selling during a period in which Ceradyne’s stock price had spiked.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen Matkins | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Allen Matkins on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.