Federal Appeals Court Finds Illinois Law Applies to Retaliatory Discharge Lawsuits, Placing Greater Evidence Burden on Plaintiffs


On July 15, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit released its opinion in Gacek v. American Airlines, Inc., and it’s big news for plaintiffs seeking justice from evildoing employers for retaliatory discharge. The news isn’t good.

Retaliatory discharge is when someone is fired without good cause as the employer retaliates against them, firing them in response to an action that the worker has taken. Whistleblowers, for example, risk retaliatory discharge by their employer.

Under the federal standard, the plaintiff only needs to show the employer’s reasons for firing the plaintiff were just pretext — unworthy of belief. That’s a lesser burden than having to prove causation.

This decision will make it much tougher for plaintiff's cases; no word yet whether the case will be appealed.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Kenneth J. Allen & Associates | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Kenneth J. Allen & Associates on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.