Has The Reasonable Inquiry Standard Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 Changed After Qualcomm?


“Has my client provided me all of the responsive documents to the opponent’s document requests?” This is a question that every litigator must ask, whether representing individuals or corporations of any size. How we satisfy ourselves that the answer to that question is yes can and does vary. However, since the decision in Qualcomm, Inc. v. Broadcom Co., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 911 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2008) both lead and local counsel may need to rethink how they go about answering that question. Otherwise, it could cost you money, your reputation, and possibly your career.

This article was originally published in ALM's Litigation Weekly, a supplement of The Legal Intelligencer publication.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.