Measure 37: Approaching Year Zero Plus Three


In November 2004, the Oregon voters passed Ballot Measure 37 (now codified as ORS 197.352), which allows property owners to make claims for compensation if the value of the claimant's property has been reduced by land use regulations

enacted or first enforced after the claimant (or certain family members) came into ownership. The initiative, which passed by a substantial margin, was the culmination of years of work by property rights advocates and others dissatisfied with the system of statewide land use planning that had evolved in Oregon since the passage of

Senate Bill 100 in 1973. While observers of the electoral process will continue to debate the intentions and understanding of the voters who enacted Measure 37, the impact of land use restrictions on the density of development, particularly in suburban and rural areas, was clearly a central concern. Proponents of the measure were able to point to concrete examples where, as the result of regulations intervening since the acquisition of their property, individual owners were no longer able to subdivide their property to permit an additional dwelling for their children, or allow development to provide anticipated retirement income.

In 2002, the Oregon Supreme Court invalidated a prior voter initiative, Measure 7, as an impermissible amendment of more than one portion of the Oregon Constitution in a single ballot measure. While Measure 7 presented an amendment to the Oregon Constitution, Measure 37 created a purely statutory scheme under which the government was required to compensate the affected property owners unless it chose to "modify, remove, or not to apply" the regulation

within 180 days of the owner's written demand for compensation. Legal challenges to the validity of Measure 37 appear to have been resolved by the Oregon Supreme Court’s unanimous 2006 decision in MacPherson, et al. v. Dept. of Administrative Services, et al., which upheld the

constitutionality of the new law.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Lane Powell PC - Environmental Law Blog | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Lane Powell PC - Environmental Law Blog on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.