Banner & Witcoff, Ltd.

Supreme Court Decides Bowman v. Monsanto

The Supreme Court handed down a unanimous decision today in Bowman v. Monsanto, holding the doctrine of patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds by replanting seeds after growing a first crop…more

| Intellectual Property

Supreme Court to Weigh In on Gene Patents

On April 15, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. At issue is the eligibility of Myriad’s patent claims to isolated DNA encoding BRCA1 polypeptides…more

| Intellectual Property

Supreme Court Hears Arguments in FTC v. Actavis

On March 25, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, a case involving a circuit split regarding “pay for delay” settlements within the pharmaceutical industry. The Supreme Court…more

| Intellectual Property

Supreme Court Decides Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

The U.S. Supreme Court has just issued its decision in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.1, and its holding could have consequences on international sales and trafficking of copyrighted goods. In short, the Supreme Court held…more

| Intellectual Property

Supreme Court Hears Arguments in Bowman v. Monsanto

On February 19, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Bowman v. Monsanto, a case in which Indiana farmer Bowman argued that purchaser’s rights should trump patent rights. Bowman purchased commodity soybeans from a…more

| Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Federal Circuit Hears Arguments in Myriad Genetics Case

The Federal Circuit heard arguments July 20, 2012 in the long-running dispute between The Association for Molecular Pathology and Myriad Genetics, Inc. (Myriad), which the Supreme Court returned to the Federal Circuit for…more

| Intellectual Property

The Future of Multi-Defendant Patent Cases

On September 16, 2011, President Obama signed into law the America Invents Act (AIA), which effectuated some of the most sweeping changes in the patent laws since the Patent Act of 1952. One such change under the AIA impacts a…more

| Intellectual Property

Supreme Court Decides Golan v. Holder

Public Domain? – Maybe Not When information enters the public domain it is free for anyone to use it – right? Maybe yes and maybe no. This uncertainty is likely the better answer in light of the recent decision by the…more

| Intellectual Property

This profile may constitute attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Any correspondence with this profile holder does not constitute a client/attorney relationship. Neither the content on this profile nor transmissions between you and the profile holder through this profile are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship.

×

Expand Your Reach

JD Supra gets your content noticed, increases your visibility and makes your marketing efforts hassle free...

Learn More  or  Schedule a demo