Kroll Ontrack Inc.

9023 Columbine Rd.
Eden Prairie, MN 55347, United States

  • (952) 937-5161

Prevailing Party Awarded Taxable Costs from Production to Opposing Party (California)

Apple Inc. v. Samsung, 2014 WL 4745933 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 19, 2014). In this intellectual property case, the plaintiff sought to recover around $1.5 million in costs for producing documents to an online hosted repository,…more
| Civil Procedure, Civil Remedies, Electronic Discovery, Intellectual Property, Taxation

The Decade of Discovery: Coming Soon to a City Near You

Traversing the infamous Hollywood Walk of Fame elicits visions of glitz and glamour, a street afire with opening nights, leading ladies and leading men, iconic directors and prolific producers, and films that place marked key…more
| Electronic Discovery

Part III – FRCP Amendments: The Long and Winding Road

Where We Are Now - On September 16, 2014, the Judicial Conference officially approved the proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The rules are now pending before the Supreme Court, and provided they…more
| Civil Procedure, Electronic Discovery

Parties’ Joint Stipulation Frustrates Defendants and Allows Plaintiffs to Not Produce Native Files (California)

Melian Labs, Inc. v. Triology LLC, No. 13-cv-04791-SBA, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124343 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 4, 2014). In this trademark dispute, the plaintiff sought a declaratory judgment that its website did not infringe upon…more
| Civil Procedure, Electronic Discovery, Intellectual Property

Court Allows Use of Predictive Coding, but Says It Shouldn’t Have To (Texas)

Dynamo Holdings v. Comm’r, Nos. 2685-11, 8393-12, 2014 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 40 (U.S. Tax Sept. 17, 2014). In this tax law case, the defendant requested the plaintiff produce two backup storage tapes. The plaintiff…more
| Civil Procedure, Electronic Discovery, Taxation

Shoddy Mobile Device Use Policy and Failure to Institute Litigation Hold Leads to Default Judgment and Hefty Sanctions (Nevada)

Small v. Univ. Med. Ctr. of S. Nev., No. 2:13-cv-00298-APG-PAL, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114406 (D. Nev. Aug. 18, 2014). In this employment law dispute, the court appointed a special master to resolve discovery issues. The…more
| Civil Procedure, Civil Remedies, Electronic Discovery, Labor & Employment Law

Judge Issues Sua Sponte Order Chastising Modern Ediscovery Practices (Iowa)

Sec. Nat’l Bank of Sioux City, Iowa v. Abbot Laboratories, No. C 11-4017-MWB, 2014 WL 3704277 (N.D. Iowa July 28, 2014). In this product liability case, the court filed a sua sponte order on the “serious pattern of…more
| Civil Procedure, Civil Remedies, Electronic Discovery, Products Liability

Court Denies Forensic Imaging After Parties Do Not Agree to Production at Meet-and-Confer (California)

Boston Scientific Corp. v. Lee, No. 2041 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107584 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2014). In this intellectual property case, the plaintiff corporation alleged that the defendant’s employment with another company…more
| Civil Procedure, Electronic Discovery, Intellectual Property

Why Even the Most Cutthroat Lawyer Should Want to Cooperate

Litigants are rarely genuinely interested in cooperation during litigation. Litigation is, after all, an adversarial proceeding where one side hopes to win while the other side loses. In some instances, it seems like the…more
| Electronic Discovery, Law Practice Products & Services

Get to Know Adam Strayer of Kroll Ontrack’s Ediscovery Consulting Group

A specialized field such as ediscovery produces a specialized workforce. Today, ediscovery consultants play a critical role in guiding clients through the complicated process of electronic discovery. Here at Kroll Ontrack, we…more
| Electronic Discovery

Where in the World is Ediscovery?

“Where in the world is Carmen Sandiego?” That was the question for thousands of kids in the 80’s and 90’s as they searched the digital globe for the sneakiest villains in the computer game industry. Their goal was to…more
| Electronic Discovery, International Law & Trade

Circuit Court Finds Failure to Provide Sufficient Evidence, Affirms Denial of Sanctions (Ohio)

Automated Solutions Corp. v. Paragon Data Sys., Inc., 2014 WL 2869286 (6th Cir. June 25, 2014). In this copyright infringement case, the plaintiff appealed a lower court’s ruling that denied the spoliation sanctions…more
| Civil Procedure, Civil Remedies, Electronic Discovery, Science, Computers, & Technology

Back to (Law) School: Ediscovery Education by the Numbers

Ediscovery Pop Quiz! Question: What do you get when you add the number of law schools with the number of ediscovery classes offered and then divide by the number of students who enroll in these classes? Answer: A…more
| Electronic Discovery

Court Allows Plaintiff to “Switch Horses in Midstream” and Use Predictive Coding (Tennessee)

Bridgestone Americas Inc. v. Int'l Bus. Mach. Corp., No. 3:13-1196, 2014 BL 202049 (M.D. Tenn. July 22, 2014). In this ongoing case, the plaintiff sued the defendant for a $75 million computer system that it claimed threw…more
| Civil Procedure, Electronic Discovery, Science, Computers, & Technology

Though Destruction of Evidence was Egregious, Lesser Sanctions Ordered (New York)

Hawley v. Mphasis Corp., 2014 WL 3610946 (S.D.N.Y. July 22, 2014). In this employment discrimination case, the plaintiff moved for sanctions due to defendant’s alleged discovery violations. The plaintiff claimed that the…more
| Civil Procedure, Civil Remedies, Civil Rights, Electronic Discovery, Labor & Employment Law
Showing 1-15 of 134 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 9
Areas of Practice
  • Electronic Discovery
Locations
Other U.S. Locations
  • California
  • D.C.
  • Minnesota
  • New Jersey
  • New York
  • Virginia
This profile may constitute attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Any correspondence with this profile holder does not constitute a client/attorney relationship. Neither the content on this profile nor transmissions between you and the profile holder through this profile are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship.