2013 for ediscovery “was a very good year.” The courts’ unified message was simple (showing a renewed interest proportionality and cooperation), clear (attorneys in 2013 must know ediscovery), and even a bit provocative (see…more
What happens when seven of the smartest, most articulate ediscovery professionals come together for an hour talk about—quite frankly—whatever they want?
Just yesterday Josh Gilliland, Samir Mathur, Barry Murphy, Ralph…more
United States v. Tutt, 2013 WL 5707791 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 21, 2013).
In this criminal case, the court granted the defendant’s subpoena duces tecum for the production of the arresting officers’ personnel files, internal…more
Banas v. Volcano, 2013 WL 5513246 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2013).
In this search dispute, the defendants unilaterally adopted a “triangulation” approach to identifying ESI responsive to the plaintiffs’ requests for production…more
Perhaps the most critical point of time in an ediscovery matter is when the attorneys and litigation teams learn ediscovery will play a significant role in the case. Whether the red flag comes from a client’s dust-coated legacy…more
Ruiz-Bueno, III v. Scott, 2013 WL 6055402 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 15, 2013).
In this wrongful death case, the plaintiffs moved to compel answers to interrogatories regarding the defendants’ “methods used to search for responsive…more
Digital Vending Servs. Int’l, Inc. v. Univ. of Phoenix, Inc., 2013 WL 5533233 (E.D. Va. Oct. 3, 2013).
In this intellectual property case, the defendants filed a motion for sanctions due to the plaintiff’s alleged…more
Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC v. Southfork Sec., Inc., 2013 WL 5637747 (D. Idaho Oct. 15, 2013).
In this copyright infringement case, the plaintiff sought an ex parte temporary restraining order forcing the defendants to…more
At this point, it is probably safe to assume that almost everyone has some concept of “big data” and the challenges that data proliferation pose for ediscovery. This blog alone has discussed the big data explosion (in some form…more
Since ediscovery began, data has been collected, reviewed and produced individually, disconnected from any other ediscovery projects. Ironically, many ediscovery projects would benefit from leveraging other projects’ work and…more
Who should bear the burden of showing prejudice (or a lack thereof) as a result of spoliation? The innocent party or the spoliating party? This vexing catch-22, which requires proof of what isn’t there, has not only lead to some…more
Kwan Software Eng’g v. Foray Techs, LLC, 2013 WL 5487421 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2013).
In this case, the plaintiff motioned for a default judgment cued to the defendant’s untimely and inadequate production. The plaintiff’s…more
P.R. Tel. Co. v. San Juan Cable LLC, 2013 WL 5533711 (D.P.R. Oct. 7, 2013).
In this antitrust case, the plaintiff sought an adverse inference instruction against the defendants, who allegedly failed to preserve relevant…more
In re Pradaxa (Dabigatran Etexilate) Prods. Liab. Litig., 2013 WL 5377164 (S.D. Ill. Sept. 25, 2013).
In this multidistrict product liability litigation, the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee (PSC) sought to compel…more
Westdale Recap Props v. NP/I & G Wakefield Commons, LLC, 2013 WL 5424844 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2013).
In this real estate case, the plaintiffs motioned to compel the defendants to respond further to their requests for…more