During past month when many patent practitioners may have been distracted by the “laws of nature” meaning of the Mayo v. Prometheus decision, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued four precedential rulings…more
Can trademarks be used by a competitor as keywords and in ad text? The answers to those questions were discussed in an opinion recently issued by the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 7082.
In…more
The Supreme Court handed down a unanimous decision that a process that essentially defines how a law of nature works is unpatentable subject matter. The decision overruled a Federal Circuit holding that the claimed process was…more
What happens when a start-up company (Protostorm) retains a sole practitioner to prepare provisional patent applications, another solo lawyer to prepare the corresponding U.S. non-provisional application, and yet another firm to…more
Suppose your doctor measures your body’s response to a medication and then contemplates adjusting your medication accordingly. Did your doctor infringe someone’s patent? Maybe.
This spring, the United…more
Over four years have elapsed since the Federal Circuit first held that federal courts possess exclusive jurisdiction over patent legal malpractice claims. In Immunocept, LLC v. Fulbright & Jaworski, LLP, 504 F.3d…more
Unless your consulting agreements explicitly require your consultants to assign their inventions to you, they have no obligation to do so, and your competitors could end up owning your intellectual property.
Dr. Imants…more
The America Invents Act H.R.1249, passed the Senate on September 8, 2011, by an overwhelming vote of 89-9. It is long and complex, and will create significant changes to the U.S. patent system, which will have a wide ranging…more
You have probably heard the buzz, but it is now official. The Internet is growing and brand owners should be aware of the coming changes.
On June 20, 2011, the Board of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and…more
While it may seem that your business is at capacity dealing with .com, .net, .org, and all the other Web suffixes (also known as “top-level domains”) that are already out there, this year a new Web suffix will be introduced —…more
Back in the 1960s, counting sheep gave way to a lilting commercial ditty as a means for solving the age-old problem of falling asleep: “Take Sominex tonight and sleep, safe and restful sleep, sleep, sleep.” If you took two…more
The Federal Circuit?s recent precedential decision, Warrior Sports, Inc. v. Dickenson Wright, P.L.L.C. (issued on January 11, 2011), demonstrates (once again) the sheer power and ability of the “case-within-in-case” doctrine…more
Most chefs would never think of downloading recipes from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) patent database. To quote a Martha Stewart catchphrase, that’s probably “a good thing.” Patentese can collide…more
The recently concluded (and now appealed) Gardner v. Toyota Motor Corporation patent case offers yet another important lesson in the pitfalls of missing case schedule deadlines. These deadlines inundate patent litigation,…more
The Internet is connecting workers, markets, advertisers and contractors from all around the world. We are on Skype, Twitter, LinkedIn and Facebook nearly every day visiting with clients and friends worldwide. One of the most…more
This profile may constitute attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Any correspondence with this profile holder does not constitute a client/attorney relationship. Neither the content on this profile nor transmissions between you and the profile holder through this profile are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship.