Richard Farkas – Law Offices of Richard D. Farkas

15300 Ventura Boulevard Suite 504
Sherman Oaks, California 91403, United States

  • 818-789-6001
  • 818-789-6002
Tearlach Resources, Ltd. vs. Western States International, Inc., et al.

Answer and Objection to Petition for Review by the California Supreme Court

After the Court of Appeal reversed a lower court's dismissal, thus reinstating an $18.7+ million Judgment in favor of my clients, the matter was appealed to the California Supreme Court. This is my Answer and successful…more
|
Tearlach Resources, Ltd. vs. Western States International, Inc., et al.

Unanimous Opinion of the Court of Appeal Reinstating $18,724,901.58 Judgment

After a State Court dismissal of an action involving a contractual dispute over the assignment of an oil and gas lease on federal land, the Court of Appeal reversed the State Court dismissal, thus reinstating Judgment in favor…more
|
Tearlach Resources, Ltd. vs. Western States International, Inc., et al.

Appellant's Opening Brief in the Court of Appeal

After a State Court dismissed an oil and gas Judgment for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (based on Federal preemption), I filed a successful appeal with the Court of Appeals, arguing that the State Court had concurrent…more
|
United Pacific Energy Operations and Consulting vs. Gas and Oil Technologies, etc., et al

Trial Brief

In March of 2011, after a trial in the Kern County, California Superior Court, my clients, a publicly-traded Canadian exploration company, two of its principals and a California subsidiary, were awarded monetary damages in the…more
| Business Torts, Civil Procedure, Commercial Law & Contracts, Conflict of Laws
Constantino Noval vs. Louisa Moritz

Opinion of the California Court of Appeal affirming dismissal of complaint for malicious prosecution and slander of title

Opinion of the California Court of Appeal affirming the dismissal of a complaint for malicious prosecution and slander of title against an attorney following a demurrer to the complaint. The Court of Appeal affirmed the…more
| Civil Procedure
Weatherford vs. Gas & Oil Technologies; Tearlach vs. Western States, etc., et al

Trial Brief resulting in $18.7 million judgment in oil & gas lease litigation

This is a Trial Brief of the Defendants and Cross-complainants in complex, international oil & gas litigation in the Kern County Superior Court. The case involved a number of disputes concerning oil and gas lease rights, stock…more
| Business Torts, Civil Procedure, Conflict of Laws
Weatherford vs. Gas & Oil Technologies; Tearlach vs. Western States, etc., et al

Cross-complaint in complex, international oil and gas litigation

Cross-complaint in complex, international oil and gas litigation in Kern County, California concerning disputed oil and gas contracts and related matters. The cross-complaint includes causes of action for breach of written…more
| Business Torts, Commercial Law & Contracts
Gavrieli vs. Davidi

Plaintiff's Trial Brief

This is a Trial Brief in a case between two business competitors, dealing with unfair business practices, intentional interference, and misappropriation of trade secrets…more
| Business Torts
Henriks vs. Moritz, Noval, etc.

Memorandum Order Affirming Dismissal of RICO action

This is a Memorandum Opinion of the Court of Appeals, affirming the dismissal of a RICO complaint in its entirety, following a Motion to Dismiss filed in the district court (see related Motion to Dismiss)…more
| Civil Procedure, Civil Remedies
Henriks vs. Moritz, Noval, etc., et al.

Defendant's Motion to Dismiss RICO case as a SLAPP suit

This is a California notice of motion and special motion to dismiss a RICO case against an attorney and certain clients, based on California's anti-SLAPP statute. The motion led to the complete dismissal of the RICO complaint…more
| Business Torts, Civil Procedure
Hollander, Cardio-Health vs. Prevention Concepts, Barth, etc., et al

Second Amended Complaint

Complaint filed in California (Los Angeles) Superior Court, alleging causes of action for 1. BREACH OF ORAL CONTRACT 2. BREACH OF WRITTEN CONTRACTS 3. BREACH OF THE COVENANT OF GOOD FAITH & FAIR…more
| Business Torts, Commercial Law & Contracts
Hollander vs. Prevention Concepts, Barth, etc., et al

Opposition to Demurrer and Motion to Strike

Opposition to Demurrer and Motion to Strike complaint alleging causes of action for Breach of Contract, Anticipatory Breach of Contract, Breach of the Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, Violation of Section 17200 of the…more
| Business Torts, Civil Procedure, Commercial Law & Contracts
SEUNG WOO LEE and GIL SOO RYU vs. IMAGING3, INC.

Appellant's Opening Brief

This case involves disputed contentions concerning the validity of an award made against Defendant/Appellant before the Korean Arbitration Board and of the counterclaims of Appellant before the United States District Court. The…more
| Business Torts, Civil Procedure, Commercial Law & Contracts, International Law & Trade
SEUNG WOO LEE vs. IMAGING3, INC.

Appellant's Opening Brief

This case involves disputed contentions concerning the validity of an award made against Defendant/Appellant before the Korean Arbitration Board and of the counterclaims of Appellant before the United States District Court. The…more
| Business Torts, Civil Procedure, Civil Remedies, Conflict of Laws, International Law & Trade
Stellar vs. State Farm Insurance

Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment

Plaintiff opposed Defendant State Farm's Motion for Summary Judgment on the issue of whether allegations of emotional distress from alleged defamation were covered under a homeowner's insurance policy. Plaintiff, tendering…more
| Civil Procedure, Insurance
Showing 1-15 of 20 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 2
Areas of Practice
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
  • Appellate Practice
  • Art, Entertainment, & Sports Law
  • Business Organizations
  • Business Torts
  • Commercial Law & Contracts
  • Construction Law
  • Insurance
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Real Estate
  • Science, Computers, & Tech
See more
This profile may constitute attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Any correspondence with this profile holder does not constitute a client/attorney relationship. Neither the content on this profile nor transmissions between you and the profile holder through this profile are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship.