Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P.

800 LaSalle Avenue 2800 LaSalle Plaza
Minneapolis, MN 55402-2015, United States

  • 612.349.8500
  • 612.339.4181

Protecting Big Data Systems in a Post-Alice World

Owners of software patents took a blow last June with the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Alice Corp v. CLS Bank International. The Alice Court held that, to be eligible for patent protection, computer-driven innovations must…more
| Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Protecting Trade Secrets During Business Collaboration [Video]

Businesses are increasingly working together to develop new products and services. With that collaboration is the risk that precious trade secrets will be lost. Attorney Christopher Larus sits down with Seth Northrop to discuss…more
| Intellectual Property

Women GCs: The Best Advice I Ever Received

Over three days during September 17-19, InsideCounsel magazine succeeded where others have not. They created a national forum to facilitate women-to-women exchange on current legal issues. This year’s conference was the second…more
| Law Practice Products & Services

Top Five Governance & Compliance Hot Topics For General Counsel

On September 18, 2014, InsideCounsel magazine held a corporate counsel conference to facilitate discussions on current legal issues. In sessions on governance and compliance, industry experts addressed the current top…more
| Commercial Law & Contracts

Invalidity under § 101 and defensive collateral estoppel defeat second DietGoal case

CaDietGoal Innovations LLC v. Time, Inc. Case Number: 1:13-cv-08381 - Last month, in DietGoal Innovations LLC v. Bravo Media LLC, Case No. 1:13–cv-08391–PAE, we reported on Judge Engelmayer’s invalidation of…more
| Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

Stay pending interlocutory appeal of denial of stay for ungranted CBM petitions denied

Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al. Case Number: 1:13-cv-03777 - Summary: JP Morgan Chase (“JPMC”), having lost a motion to stay this case pending resolution of IPRs and CBMs [LINK TO 19 ],…more
| Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

No stays for IPRs and CBMs in view of advanced stage of litigation and long PTAB timeline

Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al. Case Number: 1:13-cv-03777 - Summary: In litigation filed June 2013 with a trial anticipated in the summer of 2015, Judge Hellerstein denied JP Morgan…more
| Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

Update: Patent valuation documents are relevant to this patent case

Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al. Case Number: 1:13-cv-03777 - Last month, we reported that the court concluded that documents relating to patent valuation “have little or no relevance”…more
| Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

Indirect infringement claims by Cuisinart against Mr. Coffee not tossed

Conair Corporation v. Jarden Corporation et al. Case Number: 1:13-cv-06702 - Jarden (maker of “Mr. Coffee” brand expresso [should “expresso” be “espresso” throughout?], cappuccino and latte machines) asked the…more
| Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

Judge Griesa finds a patent prosecution bar does not preclude litigation counsel from assisting in an IPR, and would have reached the same conclusion even if the protective order explicitly barred such assistance

Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al. Case Number: 1:12-cv-08060 - Patentee Endo asked the court to rule that the protective orders in the patent infringement cases it filed…more
| Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

IP|Trend: Inter Partes Review: Is It Still Right For You? [Video]

When we first addressed inter partes review (IPR), it was in its infancy. Now with almost two years under its belt, we’ve learned a lot about how IPR works and how some of the results have played out in practice. Attorneys Seth…more
| Intellectual Property

Move Over, Billable Hour; There's a New IP Fee Arrangement in Town

The practice of law has changed greatly over the past decades. We have witnessed great growth in solo and small firm practice, as well as a large movement to in-house practice. We are even seeing growth in freelance attorneys…more
| Law Practice Products & Services, Intellectual Property

Third time’s a charm – infringement contentions not stricken

Times Three Clothier, LLC v. Spanx, Inc. - Case Number: 1:13-cv-02157 - We had previously reported on Times Three’s two failures to produce satisfactory infringement contentions in its infringement case against…more
| Intellectual Property

Complaint Alleges Malpractice in Claims Drafted for Push Up Bra Inserts

Runberg, Inc. d/b/a Zephyrs v. McDermott, Will & Emery LLP, et al. - Case Number: 652543/2014 - Runberg owns U.S. Patent No. 8,216,021 (“Engineered push up insert”), which claims a kidney-shaped push up insert “for…more
| Intellectual Property, Professional Malpractice

IS THE A IN ANDA BEGINNING TO MEAN ANTITRUST? [Video]

The Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) process is one of the hottest areas of intellectual property disputes among companies today. But the Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Tyco Healthcare v. Mutual Pharmaceutical is…more
| Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Intellectual Property
Showing 1-15 of 158 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 11
Areas of Practice
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
  • Antitrust & Trade Regulation
  • Appellate Practice
  • Art, Entertainment, & Sports Law
  • Bankruptcy
  • Class Action
  • Construction Law
  • Debtor/Creditor
  • Energy & Utilities
  • Environmental Law
  • Finance & Banking
  • Health
  • Insurance
  • Intellectual Property
  • Labor & Employment Law
  • Litigation
  • Maritime Law
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Personal Injury
  • Privacy
  • Products Liability
  • Real Estate
  • Science, Computers, & Tech
  • Securities Law
  • Toxic Torts
  • Wills, Trusts, & Estate Planning
See more
Locations
Other U.S. Locations
  • California
  • Florida
  • Georgia
  • Massachusetts
  • Minnesota
  • New York
Number of Attorneys

100+ Attorneys

This profile may constitute attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Any correspondence with this profile holder does not constitute a client/attorney relationship. Neither the content on this profile nor transmissions between you and the profile holder through this profile are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship.