Roy Denton

Reply Brief of the Appellant Roy L. Denton…more

CORRECTED BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE STEVE RIEVLEY…more

Appellant Brief of Plaintiff Roy L. Denton…more

Before the Court is Defendant Steve Rievley’s motion seeking attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C § 1988 as the prevailing party in a lawsuit brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Court File No. 147). The Court referred the motion to United…more

Before the Court is Plaintiff Roy Denton’s (“Mr. Denton”) motion for an order of contempt against Defendant Steve Rievley (“Defendant) or, in the alternative, a motion for extraordinary relief (Court File No. 152), Mr. Denton’s…more

Memorandum of Chief Judge Curtis L. Collier denying my motions. It is obvious that the judge had drawn inferences out of thin air…more

Plaintiff's REPLY to DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED EVIDENTIARY HEARING and REQUEST TO GRANT OR DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION JNOV…more

DEFENDANT STEVE RIEVLEY’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED EVIDENTIARY HEARING and REQUEST TO GRANT OR DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION JNOV…more

As a pro se non lawyer, I may have jumped the gun too fast in filing this Motion. However, I gained knowledge that the defendant's attorney was able to contact the judge with a simple telephone call, whereas, I wasn't afforded…more

The test for awarding attorney’s fees to a defendant as a prevailing party under 42 U.S.C.§ 1988(b) is whether the plaintiff’s action was frivolous, unreasonable, or lacking foundation, even though it was not brought in…more

Plaintiff's REPLY to Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Order of Contempt against the Defendant Steve Rievley…more

Comes the Defendant, Steve Rievley, in his individual capacity, (herein “Officer Rievley”), through counsel, and hereby files his Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment Non Obstante Veredicte (JNOV) or In the Alternative,…more

DEFENDANT STEVE RIEVLEY’S RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR DISALLOWANCE OF DEFENDANT STEVE RIEVLEY’S BILL OF COSTS AND OBJECTIONS OF COSTS…more

The defendant’s Motion for Protective Order (Court File No. 144) is hereby REFERRED to the United States Magistrate Judge William Carter. The magistrate judge is designated to conduct such evidentiary hearings and enter such…more

DEFENDANT STEVE RIEVLEY’S RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR ORDER OF CONTEMPT AGAINST THE DEFENDANT STEVE RIEVLEY, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF…more