Rader v. County of San Bernardino et...
Mandated Reporter Immunity does not apply as a defense to Civil Rights claims filed in state court proceedings…more
Langarica v. County of Los Angeles
After hospital staff got into a dispute with Appellant, Antonio Langarica, the hospital defendants convinced the social worker defendants that Antonio had a bad attitude and needed to be brought into line. They then worked…more
Kemper v. County of San Diego, et al.
This appeal presents a case of first impression. The question raised is whether an action under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 arising from a juvenile court proceeding where child protective services social workers lied to the court in…more
Stokes et al. v. Children's Hospital...
First known ruling of its kind in California state courts. We are hopeful the defense will writ the decision so we can get the issue in front of the Court of Appeal. We are fairly confident the COA will affirm the decision,…more
Stokes et al. v. Children's Hospital...
Supporting evidence…more
Stokes et al. v. Children's Hospital...
Winning reply arguments...Nice win…more
Stokes et al. v. Children's Hospital...
Children's Hospital's failed attempt to defend their application of Mandated Reporter Immunity in a federal civil rights action against one of its doctors…more
Stokes et al. v. Children's Hospital...
This is the winning memorandum of points and authorities in support of our attack on Children's Hospital's assertion of Mandated Reporter Immunity in a state court action for violation of federal civil rights…more
On April 18, 2011, the United State Supreme Court denied Orange County’s petition for certiorari filed in October 2010. The petition arose from a 2007 jury verdict of $4.9 million against Orange County and two of its social…more
Fogarty-Hardwick v. County of Orange,...
After a decade of litigation, Orange County must now pay nearly $9.5 million to a mother whose children were wrongfully removed from her care in February 2000. On December 17, 2010 Orange County Superior Court Judge, Ronald…more
Rock & Roll REligion, Inc. v. Robert...
There is no likelihood of confusion between Chinese Laundry and English Laundry. Chinese Laundry's case was exceptional only in its lack of merit. Attorney's fees were appropriately awarded to English Laundry…more
Fogarty-Hardwick v. County of Orange,...
Today, the Fourth District Court of Appeal Affirmed the Judgment in Fogarty-Hardwick v. County of Orange, et al. in so doing the unanimous court stated: "The fact that a very well respected member of the superior court bench…more
Rock & Roll REligion, Inc. v. Robert...
The underlying case was exceptional in its lack of merit. Thus, Counterdefendants, as the prevailing parties, were entitled to their attorney's fees under Section 1117(a)…more
Complaint for violation of rights of familial association…more
Frank Marshall et al. v. County of Los...
The County of Los Angeles settled a civil rights action brought by the grandparents of two minors for the warrantless removal of the children from their home in violation of the family’s constitutional rights to familial…more
This profile may constitute attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Any correspondence with this profile holder does not constitute a client/attorney relationship. Neither the content on this profile nor transmissions between you and the profile holder through this profile are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship.