Howard Ullman – Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe

405 Howard Street
San Francisco , CA 94105, United States

  • 415-773-5652
  • 415-773-5759

Could Amazon Possibly Be a Monopolist?

Franklin Foer, at the New Republic, argues that the answer is yes. The alleged “crime”: predatory pricing — if not express, than at least in spirit…more
| Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Commercial Law & Contracts, Criminal Law

Can you ever successfully Daubert an antitrust economist?

It’s really a very difficult thing to do — and query whether it’s worth the effort. See, e.g., The Apple iPod iTunes Antitrust Litigation, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136437 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 26, 2014) (Gonzalez Rogers, J.) (denying…more
| Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Civil Procedure, Commercial Law & Contracts, Science, Computers, & Technology

Ninth Circuit Holds State Action Immunity Doctrine Bars Claims Against Convention Center

In United National Maintenance, Inc. v. San Diego Convention Center, Inc., No. 12-56809 (9th Cir. May 14, 2014), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the San Diego Convention center enjoyed…more
| Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Civil Procedure, Commercial Law & Contracts

N.D. Cal. Just Opened the Damages Umbrella

In County of San Mateo v. CSL, Limited, Case No. 3:10-cv-05686-JSC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2014) (Corley, M.J.), the Northern District of California held that California’s antitrust law, the Cartwright Act, allows the recovery of…more
| Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Civil Procedure, Civil Remedies, Commercial Law & Contracts

The Senate is Considering Minimum Resale Pricing for Contact Lenses

NPR has the story. Under federal law, of course, RPM is subject to the Rule of Reason. Apparently the Senate is interested because a large portion of the contact lens market is subject to the restrictions…more
| Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Commercial Law & Contracts

Northern District of California Addresses Functional Discounts, Price Discrimination Claims

In Mathew Enterprise, Inc. v. Chrysler Group, LLC, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95522 (N.D. Cal. July 11, 2014) (Freeman, J.), the court dismissed certain Robinson-Patman Act price discrimination claims and allowed others to proceed,…more
| Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Civil Procedure, Commercial Law & Contracts

A World Without Patents?

Planet Money’s recent podcast interviews two economists who advocate for the ultimate patent law reform: the abolition of patents. They argue that patents inhibit innovation. For example, the Wright Brothers supposedly…more
| Finance & Banking, Intellectual Property

Basketball, Surreptitious Recordings, and Antitrust

Donald Sterling — yes, that Donald Sterling — filed an antitrust lawsuit a few days ago against the National Basketball Association... ...It’s not clear if the complaint has now been mooted — Mr. Sterling apparently…more
| Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Art, Entertainment, & Sports Law, Commercial Law & Contracts

Collusion Regarding Terms of Medical Resident Employment?

Did you ever wonder why teaching hospitals can conduct their medical residency “match” program? And why they can share data and use it to help set wages for residents? And why the match program effectively forbids salary…more
| Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Education, Health

A Rare Challenge to a Class Action Settlement . . . From a Named Plaintiff

One of the named class plaintiffs in the high-tech employee antitrust case has filed an objection to the proposed class settlement. The plaintiff, Mr. Michael Devine, analogized the approximately $300 million settlement (worth…more
| Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Civil Procedure, Civil Remedies, Commercial Law & Contracts

Northern District of California Raises the Bar on Exclusive Dealing Claims

In PNY Technologies, Inc. v. SanDisk Corp., Case No. C-11-04689 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2014) (Orrick, J.), the court dismissed PNY’s exclusive dealing and attempted monopolization claims.... ...The case is significant…more
| Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Civil Procedure, Commercial Law & Contracts

Digital Content Producers (Still) Lack Antitrust Standing to Sue Wireless Carriers Over MMS

In a prior post, I covered the district court’s decision in Davis v. AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. There, the Central District of California dismissed antitrust claims against various wireless telephone companies and other…more
| Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Civil Procedure, Communications & Media Law, Constitutional Law, Intellectual Property

On the Difficulty of Dauberting Antitrust Economists

It’s difficult. Despite a valiant effort, the defendants in In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation, 2014 U.S. Dist. Lexis 47181 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2014) (Koh, J.), failed to exclude the expert testimony of plaintiffs’…more
| Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Civil Procedure, Commercial Law & Contracts, Labor & Employment Law

Book Review: Louis Kaplow’s Competition Policy and Price Fixing

Undoubtedly you’ve seen television commercials by a well-known insurance company where one character turns to another and says: “you can save 15% or more in 15 minutes.” The other character then replies: “everyone knows that,…more
| Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Commercial Law & Contracts

U.S. Supreme Court to Decide When Professional Licensing Bodies Have Antitrust Immunity

The state action immunity doctrine shields private actors from antitrust liability if their activities are actively supervised by a state. But arms of the state itself generally don’t have to satisfy the…more
| Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Commercial Law & Contracts, Health
Showing 1-15 of 152 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 11
Areas of Practice
  • Antitrust & Trade Regulation
  • Appellate Practice
  • Business Organizations
  • Business Torts
  • Class Action
  • Commercial Law & Contracts
  • Intellectual Property
  • International Law & Trade
  • Litigation
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
This profile may constitute attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Any correspondence with this profile holder does not constitute a client/attorney relationship. Neither the content on this profile nor transmissions between you and the profile holder through this profile are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship.