Jim Manley – Mountain States Legal Foundation

Defendants do not dispute that the bridge safety surcharge is a mandatory charge, assessed against TABOR Foundation members without regard to any benefits actually conferred. Nor do Defendants raise any material dispute as to…more

This case involves an alleged taking of Brandt’s property involving a railroad right-of-way that traverses his property. Brandt appeals from the final decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims dismissing his…more

Members of the Colorado Legislature and the Colorado Union of Taxpayers Foundation (“CUT”) respectfully submit this amicus curiae brief in support of Appellant, urging reversal. The legislators filing this amicus brief are…more

The Colorado Bridge Enterprise is not a TABOR-exempt business. Colo. Const. art. X, § 20(2)(d). The CBE does not qualify as a TABOR-exempt enterprise because it does not function as self-supporting business and because in fiscal…more

Plaintiff Scott Lautenbaugh seeks preliminary injunctive relief to redress and prevent further deprivation of rights protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution by actions of Defendants…more

Plaintiff Scott Lautenbaugh seeks declaratory and injunctive relief to redress and prevent the deprivation by Defendants, acting under color of state law, of his rights against compelled speech and compelled association…more

This civil rights class action seeks immediate injunctive and declaratory relief to redress and prevent the deprivation of Plaintiff Lautenbaugh’s rights, and the rights of the class members he seeks to represent, against…more

Plaintiff seeks enforcement of the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights of the Colorado Constitution (“TABOR”). Colo. Const. art. X, § 20. TABOR requires a vote of the people before the State or any local government may: create new…more

Plaintiff seeks enforcement of the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights of the Colorado Constitution (“TABOR”). Colo. Const. art. X, § 20. TABOR requires a vote of the people before the State or any local…more

The Students for Concealed Carry on Campus filed a complaint against the University of Colorado’s Board of Regents and others alleging that the Board’s Weapons Control Policy violated the Colorado Concealed Carry Act and the…more

The Students for Concealed Carry on Campus filed a complaint against the University of Colorado’s Board of Regents and others alleging that the Board’s Weapons Control Policy violated the Colorado Concealed Carry Act…more

“Well, on the allegations of the plaintiffs here, they live in the mountains, outside of Avon, Colorado. They don’t receive postal service at their home; therefore, to get their mail they drive to Avon and to the…more

Global warming litigation tossed out: "[T]he Public Trust Doctrine has never been recognized by the Colorado courts. Plaintiffs have failed to point to a single case. Even if this Court was to apply ancient law and assume that…more

Mr. Baker is a NRA-certified Home Firearms Safety and Basic Pistol Instructor and a Utah-certified Concealed Firearms Instructor. He is licensed to carry a concealed handgun pursuant to the laws of the States of Idaho, Oregon,…more

Mishaga alleges that the ISP’s refusal to issue a FOID Card to her violates her constitutional right to bear arms and to travel. She seeks declaratory and injunctive relief against the Director to declare the Act to be…more