Mulcahy LLP

The Measure Of Cost In Predatory Pricing Antitrust Claims

The U.S. Supreme Court Implicitly Confirms That The Measure Of Cost In Predatory Pricing Antitrust Claims Is Not Necessarily Determined At The Point When The Consumer’s Participation In The Transaction Comes To An End. Instead,…more
|

Where’s This Beer Really From? Lessons on Deceptive Packaging and Labels from AB InBev Litigation

Could your beer label cost you a million dollars? In the last few years, Anheuser-Busch InBev (“AB InBev”) has been hit by class action lawsuits alleging that it deceived consumers as to where its beer is brewed. In October…more
|

NINTH CIRCUIT DISMISSES ROBINSON-PATMAN AND SHERMAN ACT CLAIMS, STATING: “WE MUST RETURN THIS CAPITALIST RUMBLE TO THE FORUM WHERE IT BELONGS: THE MARKET.”

Antitrust lawyers well know that price discrimination claims under the Robinson-Patman Act (RPA) can be very difficult to win. For example, going as far back as 1953, the Supreme Court has held that there is no buyer liability…more
| Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Franchise Law

Proposed Legislation Would Harm Franchisors Doing Business In California

Proposed amendments to the California franchise laws are quickly advancing through the State Capitol. California Senate Bill 610 and Assembly Bill 1141 were introduced this legislative session in an attempt to radically change…more
| Franchise Law

AT&T MOBILITY V. AU OPTRONICS EXTENDS THE CALIFORNIA CARTWRIGHT ACT’S EXPANSIVE GEOGRAPHICAL SCOPE

As all California antitrust lawyers know, California’s principal antitrust statute is the Cartwright Act. The Act “generally outlaws any combinations or agreements which restrain trade or competition or which fix or control…more
| Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Franchise Law

Early Impact From California Appellate Court Opinion In The Domino's Pizza Case

As expected, the opinion in Domino’s Pizza now serves as a catalyst for copycat lawsuits by plaintiffs’ lawyers. I recently ran across a lawsuit by a former employee of a Jack In The Box franchisee against both Jack In The Box…more
| Franchise Law
The Tutoring Center Franchise Corp. v. Smith

Minute Order Holding Defendant in Contempt and Awarding Attorneys' Fees

Mulcahy LLP, on behalf of client The Tutoring Centor, secured preliminary injunction enjoining defendants' unlawful business activities following the termination of the parties' franchise agreement. Defedants were later held in…more
| Franchise Law
Contact

4 Park Plaza
Suite 1230
Irvine, CA 92614, United States

Contact: Jim Mulcahy, Managing Partner

  • 9492529377
  • 949-252-0090

Areas of Practice
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
  • Antitrust & Trade Regulation
  • Business Organizations
  • Business Torts
  • Commercial Law & Contracts
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
Locations
Other U.S. Locations
  • California
Other Countries
Number of Attorneys

2-10 Attorneys

This profile may constitute attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Any correspondence with this profile holder does not constitute a client/attorney relationship. Neither the content on this profile nor transmissions between you and the profile holder through this profile are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship.

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×